Crisis Plan vs Safety Plan
Two documents, two jobs

A safety plan is what a client uses in the moment a suicidal or self-harm crisis builds. A crisis plan is the wider agreement about what happens if that fails — who is contacted, what care is escalated to, and what the client wants decided in advance. Most clients need both, and confusing them is why plans stall at step 5.
Client-held, one page, used alone in the first minutes of a crisis. Six prioritised steps from internal coping to professional contact. Written in the client's words.
Shared with the care team and often family. Covers escalation, preferred and refused interventions, medication, who to call, and what has helped or harmed in previous admissions.
Longer horizon. Early warning signs and the maintenance routine that keeps the client well — not built for acute use.
A promise not to act. No evidence of effectiveness, and it can suppress disclosure. Not a substitute for either plan above.
Rows worth filling in with the client: who holds it · when it is opened · who else has seen it · what it asks the client to do · what it asks other people to do.
- A one-page safety plan the client carries or has photographed
- A crisis plan the care team and any involved family have seen
- An agreed means-restriction arrangement with a named holder
- Out-of-hours contacts written down, not looked up
- A stated preference about hospital admission, recorded in advance
- A review date for both documents
Keep them separate documents
A safety plan folded into a longer crisis plan stops being usable in the first minutes of a crisis, which is the only window it exists for. Keep the six steps on one page the client holds, and keep escalation and advance preferences in the shared document.