Fair Fighting Rules
Ten ground rules to make a hard conversation survivable

Ten ground rules to make a hard conversation survivable

Fair fighting rules are a pre-agreed contract — drafted in calm, referenced in conflict — that distinguish disagreement from damage. The rules aren't original to any one model; they're the consolidated wisdom of Gottman, EFT, IBCT, and clinical practice on what couples who survive their fights do differently. One topic at a time. No character attacks. No contempt. Stay present. Take twenty-minute breaks once heart rate is over 100. No threats to leave used as leverage. Use I-statements. Take responsibility for your part. Aim for repair over victory. End with a repair attempt. This page lays the ten out cleanly with one-line clinical rationales, gives the couple space to sign together as a literal agreement, and asks them to choose a pause word — a single neutral signal that means 'we need to break, no one's wrong, see you in twenty.'
Read each one aloud together in session. Discuss any that one partner pushes back on — that's the live one.
Literal signatures on the bottom of the sheet. The ritual matters; couples take agreements they've signed more seriously.
One neutral word — 'pause', 'red', 'pizza.' When either partner says it, the conversation stops, no questions, for twenty minutes.
Inside a cupboard, on the fridge, on a phone background. Out of sight = not used.
Review which rules held, which broke, which need refining. Treat ruptures as data, not failures.
A pre-agreed set of ground rules a couple commits to before conflict starts — typically including one topic at a time, no character attacks, no contempt, mandatory breaks at high arousal, and a focus on repair over winning. They turn fights into productive disagreements.
Once heart rate is over 100, the brain stops processing nuance and shifts into fight-or-flight. Trying to resolve anything in that state usually causes more damage. Twenty minutes of physical separation lets the nervous system reset enough to re-engage usefully.
Common at first. The other partner can still call a pause unilaterally and follow their own rule. Modeling — not enforcement — is what shifts the system over time. If non-cooperation persists, that's a clinical conversation about willingness to repair.
No. Fair fighting rules assume baseline emotional and physical safety. In the presence of intimate-partner violence, coercive control, or systematic contempt, the priority is safety and assessment — not negotiation rules.
Worksheet — Fair Fighting Rules — provided by TherapistAssist for clinical use. Not a substitute for assessment or treatment.